On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/12/2020 12:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:12 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > >> + * Unregister multiple software nodes at once. The array will be unwound in > >> + * reverse order (i.e. last entry first) and thus if any member of the array > >> + * has its .parent member set then they should appear later in the array such > >> + * that they are unregistered first. > > > > I'm, as being not a native speaker, a bit confused by this comment. > > The idea is that children are unregistered first. Can you try to make > > it more clear maybe? > > Sure, how about: > > The array will be unwound in reverse order (i.e. last entry first). If > any member of the array is a child of another member then the child must children ? > appear later in the array than their parent, so that they are > unregistered first. I think with the above change it will be better, yes. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
