> > Sorry. Please ignore this. I added some printk here while testing > one numa. Will update you the data in another email. Re-tested in one NUMA node(cpu0-cpu23): g=1 Running in threaded mode with 1 groups using 40 file descriptors Each sender will pass 100000 messages of 100 bytes w/o: 7.689 7.485 7.485 7.458 7.524 7.539 7.738 7.693 7.568 7.674=7.5853 w/ : 7.516 7.941 7.374 7.963 7.881 7.910 7.420 7.556 7.695 7.441=7.6697 w/ but dropped select_idle_cluster: 7.752 7.739 7.739 7.571 7.545 7.685 7.407 7.580 7.605 7.487=7.611 g=2 Running in threaded mode with 2 groups using 40 file descriptors Each sender will pass 100000 messages of 100 bytes w/o: 10.127 10.119 10.070 10.196 10.057 10.111 10.045 10.164 10.162 9.955=10.1006 w/ : 9.694 9.654 9.612 9.649 9.686 9.734 9.607 9.842 9.690 9.710=9.6878 w/ but dropped select_idle_cluster: 9.877 10.069 9.951 9.918 9.947 9.790 9.906 9.820 9.863 9.906=9.9047 g=3 Running in threaded mode with 3 groups using 40 file descriptors Each sender will pass 100000 messages of 100 bytes w/o: 15.885 15.254 15.932 15.647 16.120 15.878 15.857 15.759 15.674 15.721=15.7727 w/ : 14.974 14.657 13.969 14.985 14.728 15.665 15.191 14.995 14.946 14.895=14.9005 w/ but dropped select_idle_cluster: 15.405 15.177 15.373 15.187 15.450 15.540 15.278 15.628 15.228 15.325=15.3591 g=4 Running in threaded mode with 4 groups using 40 file descriptors Each sender will pass 100000 messages of 100 bytes w/o: 20.014 21.025 21.119 21.235 19.767 20.971 20.962 20.914 21.090 21.090=20.8187 w/ : 20.331 20.608 20.338 20.445 20.456 20.146 20.693 20.797 21.381 20.452=20.5647 w/ but dropped select_idle_cluster: 19.814 20.126 20.229 20.350 20.750 20.404 19.957 19.888 20.226 20.562=20.2306 Thanks Barry