[PATCH v1 2/3] irqdomain: Get rid of special treatment for ACPI in __irq_domain_add()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



After change __irq_domain_add() to cooperate better with fwnodes
we don't need to have special treatment for ACPI case.

Get rid of the special treatment for ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 17 +----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index d59a4224f920..c6204bc606a2 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -161,22 +161,7 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, int size,
 			domain->name = fwid->name;
 			break;
 		}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-	} else if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
-		struct acpi_buffer buf = {
-			.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER,
-		};
-		acpi_handle handle;
-
-		handle = acpi_device_handle(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
-		if (acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buf) == AE_OK) {
-			domain->name = buf.pointer;
-			domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
-		}
-
-		domain->fwnode = fwnode;
-#endif
-	} else if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
+	} else if (is_of_node(fwnode) || is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
 		char *name;
 
 		/*
-- 
2.26.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux