Bail out if we match the OEM information, to save some possible
extra iteration. And update the code to fix minor coding style issue.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 8d8da76..d0ca300 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data;
struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {
- char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE +1];
+ char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1];
char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE + 1];
u32 oem_revision;
};
@@ -93,8 +93,10 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_info); i++) {
if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) &&
!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
- wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision)
+ wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) {
apply_hisi_workaround = true;
+ break;
+ }
}
}
--
1.7.12.4
