On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 20:18 +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx < > > linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Pandruvada, Srinivas > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:48 AM > > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Natarajan, > > Janakarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@xxxxxxx>; linux- > > acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx>; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; > > viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx; Moore, Robert > > <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>; Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@xxxxxxxxx>; > > rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] acpi/cppc: Add support for optional CPPC > > registers > > > > On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 20:26 +0000, Natarajan, Janakarajan wrote: > > > From: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Newer AMD processors support a subset of the optional CPPC > > > registers. > > > Create show, store and helper routines for supported CPPC > > > registers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx> > > > [ carved out into a patch, cleaned up, productized ] > > > Signed-off-by: Janakarajan Natarajan < > > > Janakarajan.Natarajan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > [..] > > > > > + /* desired_perf is the only mandatory value in perf_ctrls */ > > > + if (cpc_read(cpu, desired_reg, &desired)) > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > + > > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, max_reg, &max)) > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > + > > > > We should create and use different macro other than CPPC_SUPPORTED. > > CPC_SUPPORTED doesn't validate the correctness of object type for a > > field. For example "Maximum Performance Register" can only be > > buffer > > not integer. In this way invalid field definitions can be ignored. > > > > So create something like "CPPC_SUPPORTED_BUFFER" for buffer-only > registers? > > And then buffer/integer registers will continue to use > "CPPC_SUPPORTED". > > These seem to be the only two cases at this time. Is this okay? Yes. Thanks, Srinivas > > Thanks, > Yazen > > > > > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, min_reg, &min)) > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > + > > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(energy_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, energy_reg, > > > &energy)) > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > + > > > + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_enable_reg) && > > > + cpc_read(cpu, auto_sel_enable_reg, &auto_sel_enable)) > > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > > + > > > > Here it is fine to use CPC_SUPPORTED as the "Autonomous Selection > > Enable" can be both integer and buffer. > > > > Thanks, > > Srinivas > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
