Re: [PATCH 5/6] acpi/cppc: Add support for optional CPPC registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 20:26 +0000, Natarajan, Janakarajan wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Newer AMD processors support a subset of the optional CPPC registers.
> Create show, store and helper routines for supported CPPC registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> [ carved out into a patch, cleaned up, productized ]
> Signed-off-by: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@xxxxxxx>
> 

[..]

> +	/* desired_perf is the only mandatory value in perf_ctrls */
> +	if (cpc_read(cpu, desired_reg, &desired))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, max_reg, &max))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +
We should create and use different macro other than CPPC_SUPPORTED.
CPC_SUPPORTED doesn't validate the correctness of object type for a
field. For example "Maximum Performance Register" can only be buffer
not integer. In this way invalid field definitions can be ignored.


> +	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, min_reg, &min))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(energy_reg) && cpc_read(cpu, energy_reg,
> &energy))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_enable_reg) &&
> +	    cpc_read(cpu, auto_sel_enable_reg, &auto_sel_enable))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +
Here it is fine to use CPC_SUPPORTED as the "Autonomous Selection
Enable" can be both integer and buffer.

Thanks,
Srinivas

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux