On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:42:09PM +0000, Thomas Preston wrote: > On 25/03/2019 13:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch > > > per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] > > > umbrella as a database for such excerpts. > > > > > > Thomas, can you do that? > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > I will :) Thank you! I will take either GH PR, or you may send an email to maintainers, i.e. Mika and me (PR is preferable because it would be seen publicly) > > > > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > > > > Sorry for not noticing earlier. > > > > Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on > > their own. > The device is a TI tmp75b temperature sensor [0]. The HID is completely > made up, I'm afraid. It doesn't exist in the registry. Thanks for clarification. In that case I would rather recommend to use simple PRP0001 as a _HID. > [0] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tmp75b.pdf -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
