Hello Rafael, On 2018/11/13 1:19, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> I'm just trying to ensure whatever is defined is flexible enough that >>> we really can later support everything which DT does. We have PHYs on >>> MDIO busses, inside switches, which are on MDIO busses, which are >>> inside Ethernet interfaces, etc. >> I think it can be satisfied. See the table I'm using above. > Hi Dongsheng > > > Since i don't know anything better, i think i have to trust you have > this correct. > > It would be good to document this, so that the next person who needs > to add ACPI support for a PHY has some documentation to look at. > Could you add something to Documentation/acpi/dsd? How about Andrew suggestion? I agree with Andrew. Or We need to add the documentation to Documentation/acpi? I see that both GPIO and I2C are down here. Cheers, Dongsheng
