> > I'm just trying to ensure whatever is defined is flexible enough that
> > we really can later support everything which DT does. We have PHYs on
> > MDIO busses, inside switches, which are on MDIO busses, which are
> > inside Ethernet interfaces, etc.
>
> I think it can be satisfied. See the table I'm using above.
Hi Dongsheng
Since i don't know anything better, i think i have to trust you have
this correct.
It would be good to document this, so that the next person who needs
to add ACPI support for a PHY has some documentation to look at.
Could you add something to Documentation/acpi/dsd?
Andrew
