On 18/05/18 22:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Is below patch does what you were looking for ? > > Somewhat. > See below for some minors. > Thanks >> of_property_read_u64 searches for a property in a device node and read >> a 64-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the >> property and then read 64-bit value using of_read_number, we can make >> use of of_property_read_u64. > > Suggested-by? > Yes indeed, added it locally after I sent out this patch. Will send out a proper patch soon. >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > > >> - cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL); >> - if (cache_size) >> - this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1); >> + if (!of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &cache_size)) >> + this_leaf->size = cache_size; > > I suppose it's something like this > > ret = of_property_...(..., &this_leaf->VAR); > if (ret) > warning / set default / etc OK, I do prefer this but once I was told not to use structure elements directly like that, but should be harmless in this particular case, will do so. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
