On 05/11/2018 12:41 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:01:52PM -0500, Alex G. wrote: >> I understand your concern with unhandled AER errors evolving into MCE's. >> That's extremely rare, but when it happens you still panic due to the >> MCE. > > I don't like leaving holes in the handling of PCIe errors. You need to > handle only those errors which are caused by hot-removal and not affect > other error types. Or do a comprehensive PCIe errors handling of all > errors in the AER driver. Forget about how AER works, and worry about parity with native AER. If AER is buggy, it will have the same bug in native and FFS cases. Right now we're paranoid, over-babying the errors, and don't even make it to the handler. How is this better? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
