Hi Alex,
(I haven't read through all this yet, just on this one:)
On 04/19/2018 03:57 PM, Alex G. wrote:
> Maybe it's better move the AER handling to NMI/IRQ context, since
> ghes_handle_aer() is only scheduling the real AER andler, and is irq
> safe. I'm scratching my head about why we're messing with IRQ work from
> NMI context, instead of just scheduling a regular handler to take care
> of things.
We can't touch schedule_work_on() from NMI context as it takes spinlocks and
disables interrupts. (see __queue_work()) The NMI may have interrupted
IRQ-context code
that was already holding the same locks.
IRQ-work behaves differently, it uses an llist for the work and an arch
code hook
to raise a self-IPI.
Thanks,
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
