Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 8/9] PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 4:52:24 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote:
> There is a sanity checker in the end of pci_scan_child_bus_extend() that
> tries to detect badly configured bridges. For example given the below
> topology:
> 
>   +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
>                                   +-01.0-[04-39]--
>                                   \-02.0-[3a]----00.0
> 
> The sanity checker notices this and logs following messages:
> 
>   pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39]
>   pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39]
> 
> This is not really helpful to users and the information above is not
> even correct (0000:02 is a bus not bridge). Make this a bit more
> understandable by changing the sanity checker to log following message
> in place of the above two messages:
> 
>   pci 0000:02:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign [bus 3a] for them

FWIW, I prefer to use passive voice in messages, like

 devices behind bridge are unusable, because [bus 3a] cannot be assigned for them

> While there update the comment on top of the sanity checker block to
> make it clear that it is not only restricted to CardBus.
> 
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c | 14 +++++---------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 079eea6680bb..70b07a0e00b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1175,20 +1175,16 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
>  		(is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus %04x:%02x" : "PCI Bus %04x:%02x"),
>  		pci_domain_nr(bus), child->number);
>  
> -	/* Has only triggered on CardBus, fixup is in yenta_socket */
> +	/* Check that all devices are accessible */
>  	while (bus->parent) {
>  		if ((child->busn_res.end > bus->busn_res.end) ||
>  		    (child->number > bus->busn_res.end) ||
>  		    (child->number < bus->number) ||
>  		    (child->busn_res.end < bus->number)) {
> -			dev_info(&child->dev, "%pR %s hidden behind%s bridge %s %pR\n",
> -				&child->busn_res,
> -				(bus->number > child->busn_res.end &&
> -				 bus->busn_res.end < child->number) ?
> -					"wholly" : "partially",
> -				bus->self->transparent ? " transparent" : "",
> -				dev_name(&bus->dev),
> -				&bus->busn_res);
> +			dev_info(&dev->dev,
> +				 "devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign %pR for them\n",
> +				 &child->busn_res);
> +			break;
>  		}
>  		bus = bus->parent;
>  	}
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux