On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:06 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Subset of Intel ASoC drivers is an existing user of this API when > > they > > need to find an actual instance of the codec device based on its > > ACPI > > HID." > > And why do they need the name (and not something else)? I don't know the guts of Intel ASoC implementation, so, can't answer this without investigation. Pierre, can you elaborate this piece? > > So, acpi_dev_get_name() then? > > It would be somewhat clearer to call it > acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() IMO. > > Otherwise it may not be clear what name this is going to return. Works for me. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
