On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:06 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sometimes the user want to have device name of the match rather than > > just checking if device present or not. > > I would give an example here. You mean to mention what is in patch 2? I can do that. "Subset of Intel ASoC drivers is an existing user of this API when they need to find an actual instance of the codec device based on its ACPI HID." > > To make life easier for such > > users introduce acpi_dev_get_dev_name() > > What about acpi_dev_get_match_name() or just acpi_dev_match_name()? It's "get", not "match". So, acpi_dev_get_name() then? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
