On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 06:35:03PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> For the SEA notification, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and
> ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe()
> and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove()
> also has no chance to be called. Hence, remove the unnecessary
> handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is not defined.
>
> For the NMI notification, it has the same issue as SEA notification,
> so also remove the unused dead-code for it.
>
> Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
I gave you Reviewed-by, not Signed-off-by.
Before you send more patches, read this:
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
You can read the whole document but do especially concentrate on
sections 11-13, in order to get an idea how the SOB chain and all that
patch tagging works.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
