Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] device properties: Fix return codes for __acpi_node_get_property_reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:06:13 AM CEST Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Fix more return codes for device property: Align return codes of
> __acpi_node_get_property_reference. In particular what was missed
> previously:
> 
> -EPROTO could be returned in certain cases, now -EINVAL;
> -EINVAL was returned if the property was not found, now -ENOENT;
> -EINVAL was returned also if the index was higher than the number of
> entries in a package, now -ENOENT.
> 
> Reported-by: Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: ("device property: Align return codes of __acpi_node_get_property_reference")
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> since v1:
> 
> - Remove the ugly switch from acpi_data_get_property() return value
>   handling. Only -EINVAL and -EPROTO are returned by the function.
> 
>  drivers/acpi/property.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> index 5a8ac5e1081b..e26ea209b63e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  
>  	ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, &obj);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		return ret == -EINVAL ? -ENOENT : -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The simplest case is when the value is a single reference.  Just
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  
>  		ret = acpi_bus_get_device(obj->reference.handle, &device);
>  		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +			return ret == -ENODEV ? -EINVAL : ret;
>  
>  		args->adev = device;
>  		args->nargs = 0;
> @@ -621,8 +621,10 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  	 * The index argument is then used to determine which reference
>  	 * the caller wants (along with the arguments).
>  	 */
> -	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || index >= obj->package.count)
> -		return -EPROTO;
> +	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (index >= obj->package.count)
> +		return -ENOENT;
>  
>  	element = obj->package.elements;
>  	end = element + obj->package.count;
> 

Applied (along with the previous one), thanks!

Please double check my current linux-next branch, though, as I'm going to
push this stuff to Linus tomorrow.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux