On 9 October 2017 at 19:06, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:43:31AM +1100, Ian W MORRISON wrote: <snip> >> >> This patch set addresses this by making BT_HCIUART_BCM dependent on >> SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT which in turn is dependent on SERIAL_DEV_BUS >> and ensures that if SERIAL_DEV_BUS is selected is the code is build it. > > Ok, so you didn't even bother to write two distinct commit messages for > your two patches, and my comments to the first patch apply also here. > <snip> > > Johan Hi Johan, My experience in submitting patches is still limited and I am very much learning so thanks for the helpful comments and apologies for trying your patience. My keenness on submitting patches was to show that I had tested my suggestions so as to given them credibility rather than any attempt to own the patch. What I was trying to do here was to suggested two patches with one requiring the other. Rather than keep as a single patch affecting two files I separated into two patches attempting to create a patch series with a single changelog. This was the wrong approach and I may have misled so apologies for that. Regards, Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
