Re: [PATCH] acpi/processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:46:30 AM CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and
> does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
>  
>  }
>  
> -void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
> +static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
>  {
>  	/* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
>  	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
> 

Applied, thanks!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux