On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:46:30 AM CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and
> does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
>
> }
>
> -void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
> +static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
> {
> /* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
> acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
>
Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
