From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and
does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
}
-void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
+static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
{
/* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
