Hi Sergei,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:31:12AM -0700, Sergei Temerkhanov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Sergey,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:47:11AM +0000, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
> >> This commit modifies ARM64-specific ACPI PCI support functions to
> >> properly set the numa_node property on host bridges and thus on PCI
> >> devices. Such support requires _PXM objects to be set in DSDT/SSDT
> >> tables describing PCI root bridges
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> index 4f0e3ebfea4b..c45c7a26f984 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> @@ -81,7 +81,16 @@ int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> >>
> >> int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
> >> {
> >> - return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
> >> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
> >
> > Well, this implicit cast is a guess (ie it might be a DT sysdata
> > and there you can't have a clue on what it really is).
>
> Yes, but it's only accessed when acpi_disabled != 0. I just tried to
> save few lines and brackets :-)
I have put together a patch, I will drop it on linux-pci next week
so that we can all have a look and test it.
Thanks !
Lorenzo
> Regards,
> Sergey
>
> >
> >> + struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
> >> + struct device *dev;
> >> +
> >> + if (!acpi_disabled)
> >> + adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
> >> +
> >> + dev = adev ? &adev->dev : &bus->dev;
> >> +
> >> + return dev_to_node(dev);
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node);
> >>
> >> @@ -186,6 +195,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> >> struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> >> struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops;
> >>
> >> + set_dev_node(&root->device->dev, node);
> >
> > Ok I suspect this is one of those catch-22 issues with host bridge
> > creation/scan code (like domain nr), let me have a look I will send
> > you a patch next week when I figure out the call ordering required
> > to make this work, I want to make sure we can make this work with
> > DT and ACPI alike.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Lorenzo
> >
> >> +
> >> ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> >> if (!ri)
> >> return NULL;
> >> --
> >> 2.12.1
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
