Re: [PATCH] arm64: acpi: Support PCI devices numa_node property in ACPI mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:47:11AM +0000, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
>> This commit modifies ARM64-specific ACPI PCI support functions to
>> properly set the numa_node property on host bridges and thus on PCI
>> devices. Such support requires _PXM objects to be set in DSDT/SSDT
>> tables describing PCI root bridges
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> index 4f0e3ebfea4b..c45c7a26f984 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> @@ -81,7 +81,16 @@ int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
>>
>>  int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>> -     return dev_to_node(&bus->dev);
>> +     struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
>
> Well, this implicit cast is a guess (ie it might be a DT sysdata
> and there you can't have a clue on what it really is).

Yes, but it's only accessed when acpi_disabled != 0. I just tried to
save few lines and brackets :-)

Regards,
Sergey

>
>> +     struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
>> +     struct device *dev;
>> +
>> +     if (!acpi_disabled)
>> +             adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
>> +
>> +     dev = adev ? &adev->dev : &bus->dev;
>> +
>> +     return dev_to_node(dev);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node);
>>
>> @@ -186,6 +195,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>       struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>>       struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops;
>>
>> +     set_dev_node(&root->device->dev, node);
>
> Ok I suspect this is one of those catch-22 issues with host bridge
> creation/scan code (like domain nr), let me have a look I will send
> you a patch next week when I figure out the call ordering required
> to make this work, I want to make sure we can make this work with
> DT and ACPI alike.
>
> Thanks !
> Lorenzo
>
>> +
>>       ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>>       if (!ri)
>>               return NULL;
>> --
>> 2.12.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux