On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 04/19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > The first two items in the _BCL method response are special: >>> > >>> > - Level when machine has full power >>> > - Level when machine is on batteries >>> > - .... actual supported levels go there .... >>> > >>> > So this commits adds an enum and uses its descriptive elements >>> > throughout the code, instead of magic numbers. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Are there any differences between this and the previous version of the >>> patch you posted? >>> >> >> No; this patch is identical in both v2 and v3 patchsets. >> >> Differences between v3 and v2 are as follows: In v3 I removed the middle >> patch (which was renaming the global flag device_id_scheme), and also >> amended the last patch: added the comment for that flag. Everything else >> is identical. > > OK, thanks! The v2 has been applied. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
