On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 04/19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > The first two items in the _BCL method response are special: >> > >> > - Level when machine has full power >> > - Level when machine is on batteries >> > - .... actual supported levels go there .... >> > >> > So this commits adds an enum and uses its descriptive elements >> > throughout the code, instead of magic numbers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Frank <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Are there any differences between this and the previous version of the >> patch you posted? >> > > No; this patch is identical in both v2 and v3 patchsets. > > Differences between v3 and v2 are as follows: In v3 I removed the middle > patch (which was renaming the global flag device_id_scheme), and also > amended the last patch: added the comment for that flag. Everything else > is identical. OK, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html