Hello,
On 3/27/2017 10:19 PM, gengdongjiu wrote:
Hi Tyler,
I have a question for below code.
On 2017/3/25 0:01, Christoffer Dall wrote:
is_iabt = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu);
- if (unlikely(!is_iabt && kvm_vcpu_dabt_isextabt(vcpu))) {
+ if (unlikely(!is_iabt && kvm_vcpu_dabt_isextabt(vcpu)) && sea_status) {
kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu);
when it is SEA synchronized abort, why here inject a asynchronous abort through kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu) instead of synchronized abort? seem the original kvm source code is also do that, so I am confused about that.
thanks .
If the SEA was properly handled, then sea_status will avoid injecting
the vabt. I'm going to just return after the SEA handling in the next
patch though.
Thanks,
Tyler
return 1;
}
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
