On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:53:09 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Actually, I believe that "%zd" will work. It's made to work with size_t > > which is long long on 32 and long on 64. > > size_t is always 'long', not 'long long'. We have %pad for dma_addr_t > which may be 'long' or 'long long', but it is configuration dependent > which one it is on 32-bit. Ah your right. It was that it was defined as "int" on 32 and "long" on 64, and that caused problems with warnings when using "%d" when it was defined as long. > > We could probably introduce a %pts format string for timespec64 > and have that pretty-printed. Hmm, probably don't want a %p as that suggests its a pointer, which it should not be. Unless we pass in the address of the number. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
