On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:01:53 +0200 Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + /* > > + * When resuming from suspend-to-ram, this function can be indirectly > > + * called from early CPU startup code while the CPU is in real mode, > > + * which would fail miserably. Make sure the stack pointer is a > > + * virtual address. > > + * > > + * This check isn't as accurate as virt_addr_valid(), but it should be > > + * good enough for this purpose, and it's fast. > > + */ > > + if (unlikely((long)__builtin_frame_address(0) >= 0)) return; > > The coding style requires the `return;` to be on a separate line. Correct, and new versions of a patch should always start a new thread (unless it's a single update of a patch in a long patch series). Otherwise they get ignored. (hint hint) -- Steve > > > + > > if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead())) > > return; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
