Re: [PATCH 1/3] device property: Move FW type specific functionality to FW specific files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:03:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> +static int acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(

This is really ugly way to split arguments into multiple lines IMHO.

> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname,
> +	unsigned int elem_size, void *val, size_t nval)


I would much more see something like:

static int
acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
	const char *propname, unsigned int elem_size, void *val, size_t nval)

or even

static int
acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
				    const char *propname,
				    unsigned int elem_size,
				    void *val, size_t nval)

ditto for all occurences.

Other than that this patch looks reasonable to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux