Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] ACPI graph support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:05:04AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 07, 2017 03:49:36 PM Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > >> This set contains patches written by Mika Westerberg and by myself. The
> > > >> patchset brings support for graphs to ACPI. The functionality achieved by
> > > >> these patches is very similar to what the Device tree provides: the port
> > > >> and the endpoint concept are being employed. The patches make use of the
> > > >> _DSD property and data extensions to achieve this. The fwnode interface is
> > > >> extended by graph functionality; this way graph information originating
> > > >> from both OF and ACPI may be accessed using the same interface, without
> > > >> being aware of the underlying firmware interface.
> > > >
> > > > I've tested the patches again on ARM (OF) and x86-64 (ACPI).
> > > 
> > > OK
> > > 
> > > > I have V4L2 patches depending on the ACPI graph patchset that I'd like to
> > > > have in during the same merge window. Would you either accept a pull
> > > > request, or could I have a branch on top of v4.11-rc1 containing these
> > > > patches only (for media tree)?
> > > >
> > > > The patchset "Move firmware specific code to firmware specific locations"
> > > > depends on "Fwnode property API fixes for OF, pset". Would you prefer to
> > > > send the bugfixes as fixes to v4.11 or just put it all to v4.12?
> > > 
> > > I'll put it all into v4.12 if that's not a problem.
> > 
> > That's fine for me but see below...
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also I don't really have the time to take care of that this week due
> > > to other work.  I'll get to it next week, most likely.
> > 
> > Ack.
> > 
> > Would you prefer me to send a pull request, or pick up the patches --- in
> > the latter case I'd like to request an immutable branch with these patches
> > only on v4.11-rc1 which I could use for basing my dependent V4L2 patches
> > that go to the media tree.
> 
> So from this series I can queue up patches [1-7/16] no problem.
> 
> Patch [8/16] requires an ACK from Rob for me to take it.
> 
> Patch [9/16] is not even related to this series technically, so please send it
> separately to Greg.

I'll drop that patch from the set in this case and submit another patch
later on --- for me it was a question of where do you add a header file when
you see a randomly ordered list with some entries there twice. ;-)

> 
> Patch [10/16] needs to be folded into the one that depends on it IMO.

Will do.

> 
> I also have questions to patches [11-16/16], but I'll respond to those
> separately later.

Ack.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx	XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux