Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] ACPI graph support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, March 07, 2017 03:49:36 PM Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Rafael,

Hi,

> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > >> This set contains patches written by Mika Westerberg and by myself. The
> > >> patchset brings support for graphs to ACPI. The functionality achieved by
> > >> these patches is very similar to what the Device tree provides: the port
> > >> and the endpoint concept are being employed. The patches make use of the
> > >> _DSD property and data extensions to achieve this. The fwnode interface is
> > >> extended by graph functionality; this way graph information originating
> > >> from both OF and ACPI may be accessed using the same interface, without
> > >> being aware of the underlying firmware interface.
> > >
> > > I've tested the patches again on ARM (OF) and x86-64 (ACPI).
> > 
> > OK
> > 
> > > I have V4L2 patches depending on the ACPI graph patchset that I'd like to
> > > have in during the same merge window. Would you either accept a pull
> > > request, or could I have a branch on top of v4.11-rc1 containing these
> > > patches only (for media tree)?
> > >
> > > The patchset "Move firmware specific code to firmware specific locations"
> > > depends on "Fwnode property API fixes for OF, pset". Would you prefer to
> > > send the bugfixes as fixes to v4.11 or just put it all to v4.12?
> > 
> > I'll put it all into v4.12 if that's not a problem.
> 
> That's fine for me but see below...
> 
> > 
> > Also I don't really have the time to take care of that this week due
> > to other work.  I'll get to it next week, most likely.
> 
> Ack.
> 
> Would you prefer me to send a pull request, or pick up the patches --- in
> the latter case I'd like to request an immutable branch with these patches
> only on v4.11-rc1 which I could use for basing my dependent V4L2 patches
> that go to the media tree.

So from this series I can queue up patches [1-7/16] no problem.

Patch [8/16] requires an ACK from Rob for me to take it.

Patch [9/16] is not even related to this series technically, so please send it
separately to Greg.

Patch [10/16] needs to be folded into the one that depends on it IMO.

I also have questions to patches [11-16/16], but I'll respond to those
separately later.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux