Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Detect duplicate SSDT tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 03-03-17 03:50, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi,

From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Detect duplicate SSDT tables

Hi,

On 02-03-17 02:59, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi,

From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Detect duplicate SSDT tables

Hi,

On 01-03-17 04:21, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi,

From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Detect duplicate SSDT tables

Hi,

On 28-02-17 06:19, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi,

From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Detect duplicate SSDT tables

Some machines have the exact (byte for byte) same SSDT tables multiple
times in the root_table_list.

<snip>

Detect this and silently skip the duplicates
rather then printing a scary looking set of errors.

<snip>

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c
index 82019c0..1971cd7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c
@@ -125,6 +125,44 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL_INIT(acpi_load_tables)

 /*******************************************************************************
  *
+ * FUNCTION:    acpi_tb_find_duplicate_ssdt
+ *
+ * PARAMETERS:  table         - validated acpi_table_desc of table to check
+ *              index         - index of table to find a duplicate of
+ *
+ * RETURN:      TRUE if a duplicate is found, FALSE if not
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION: Private helper function for acpi_tb_load_namespace to
+ *              avoid trying to load duplicate ssdt tables
+ *
+ ******************************************************************************/
+static u8 acpi_tb_find_duplicate_ssdt(struct acpi_table_desc *table, u32 index)

If you really want to add this.
My suggestion is:
Invoke this function in acpi_tb_verify_temp_table().
This is the function we use to verify if a table is OK.
Otherwise it won't be installed to the global table list.

And the name should contain "aml_table" or "aml" rather than "ssdt" according to your check below.

Ok, when I've some time I will do a new version moving the functionality
to acpi_tb_verify_temp_table(). I will post a v2 with this change when
it is ready. I will also just compare the headers then as suggested in
other replies in this thread.

If you wish, I can offer help here.
It actually won't take me much time to generate such a change.

Great, if you can send me a new patch to test I'm more then willing
to make time to test it.

Thanks & Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux