On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:44:10PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > But, to the point of some of the other discussion on the thread, this ACPI sort > of power management is a very, very different model than DT so that intertwining > the two models is highly unlikely to work, IMHO. And yet this is something that is sorely needed. If you look, for example, at drivers in drivers/input/*, then all non-SOC-specific devices can easily find their way onto both ACPI-based and DT-based systems (not mentioning legacy-style boards). Having two distinct power schemes implemented in drivers will lead to many problems. Having unified way of describing hardware is how _DSD came about, right? Nobody wanted to write and maintain and test two separate ways of describing properties when one was already implemented and working. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
