On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 04:06:34PM -0800, Furquan Shaikh wrote: > >> Since regulator properties remain the same across OF and ACPI >> regulators, this series of patches provides common routine for >> obtaining regulation constraints from device tree and ACPI nodes. In > > As Lorenzo explained this is really not a good idea, ACPI has a power > management model which is just being ignored here. If you're producing > systems using ACPI you really need to use ACPI in a joined up fashion > rather than just blindly importing all DT bindings into ACPI. While > there are many areas where ACPI just doesn't do anything and as a result > it does make sense to reuse existing DT bindings there are also plenty > of areas where work has been done on the ACPI side. Regulators and > power management are definitely one of those areas. This is exactly right. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
