Re: [RFC 00/15] ACPI graph support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06/10/16 18:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:


[..]


While I agree with you, the argument which will be done and will win
most of the time to upstream something is that "we have shipped the
product with that table, we need to support it upstream...". I don't
think even you disagree with that ;)

Well, maybe they should have talked to the upstream before shipping
the product with that table?  Failing to do so is like jumping to a
pool from a tower without checking how much water is there in it in
the first place ...


Really ? I admit that I like this response and your stance here and I definitely support it but I have seen quite a few cases which tells me otherwise.

--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux