On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 02:09:41 AM Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 08:41:14 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > > > > ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the > > > > native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog > > > > implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been > > > > validated by OEMs > > > > > > > > Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Well, I applied this too. > > How can you apply this without an MFD Ack? First, Guenter has reviewed it. Second, there was no response to this: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=147467687316117&w=4 > > And it depends on the [1/4], doesn't it? > > Yes, I just found that out myself. :) > > Well I only have 4 lines of changes in drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c, so I > guess it'll be okay to apply this without the fear of conflicts. > > Do that end, please apply my: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Best, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
