On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 08:41:14 PM Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the > > native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog > > implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been > > validated by OEMs > > > > Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > Applied, thanks. Well, I applied this too. And it depends on the [1/4], doesn't it? > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c > > index bd3aa4578346..c8dee47b45d9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c > > @@ -984,6 +984,10 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev) > > int ret; > > struct resource *res; > > > > + /* If we have ACPI based watchdog use that instead */ > > + if (acpi_has_watchdog()) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > /* Setup power management base register */ > > pci_read_config_dword(dev, priv->abase, &base_addr_cfg); > > base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0x0000ff80; > > Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
