Hi Timur, On 18 August 2016 at 03:01, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> >> I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64 >> directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on >> the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning >> out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created >> in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of >> Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull >> request. >> >> If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes, >> you can proceed as above. > > > What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is > everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved. we are trying to let Tomasz's series be merged first, then this patch set will be rebased on the top of it. If everyone is OK with this patchset, I guess "in 4.9" is not a problem. I don't see any suggestion and comment for now, will keep my eyes on it. > > Who will be merging these patches? I think the clocksource maintainer will take care of it, and GTDT patch has got Rafael's ACK. > > -- > Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm > Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
