Hi Hanjun, Tomasz, On 11 August 2016 at 18:15, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2016/8/11 17:37, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> >> Hi Fu, >> >> Do you mind if I send IORT series where new drivers/acpi/arm64 directory >> would be introduced in first place ? This means your GTDT set would >> depend on IORT. > > > I think it's reasonable as the IORT for ITS is the key device enablement > for PCI MSI. I talked to Fuwei offline and he is fine with it. That's no problem at all, will do. Can I do this: (1)apply Tomasz's v8 patchset on the master branch of upstream kernel (2)rebase my v10 on the top of Tomasz's v8 (3)git format-patch as v11, repost it Is that OK for everyone? :-) > > But both the GTDT patchset and IORT are in good shape now, can we > targeting both of them for 4.9 kernel (since all go via tip tree)? > > Thanks > Hanjun -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
