I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
index c72e648..bf0e128 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_throttling");
* 1 -> acpi processor driver ignores _TPC values
*/
static int ignore_tpc;
-module_param(ignore_tpc, int, 0644);
+module_param(ignore_tpc, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_tpc, "Disable broken BIOS _TPC throttling support");
struct throttling_tstate {
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
