I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index e8e128d..b417560 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION(ACPI_DOCK_DRIVER_DESCRIPTION);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static bool immediate_undock = 1;
-module_param(immediate_undock, bool, 0644);
+module_param(immediate_undock, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(immediate_undock, "1 (default) will cause the driver to "
"undock immediately when the undock button is pressed, 0 will cause"
" the driver to wait for userspace to write the undock sysfs file "
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
