On 6/12/2016 3:02 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi,
From: Wysocki, Rafael J
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for
table loading
On 5/20/2016 2:57 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
Hi, Rafael
From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
Rafael J. Wysocki
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for
table
loading
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi, Rafael
Can we queue this up in linux-next?
ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions
can be
seen.
We need more tests around this experimental change from the real
users to
have the chances to learn the unknown cases.
If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by
reverting
[PATCH 4/4].
So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream.
Thanks in advance.
There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only
contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next
should only contain material targeted at v4.7.
For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but
I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released.
[Lv Zheng]
Great!
Thanks for the information.
Unfortunately, it is reported that the series actually causes problems
to happen.
I sent you a CC of my response to the report in question earlier today.
[Lv Zheng]
Could the problem be stopped by reverting PATCH 4/4?
Yes, it can.
However, would the series be any useful without that patch?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
