Hi, > From: Wysocki, Rafael J > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for > table loading > > On 5/20/2016 2:57 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: > > Hi, Rafael > > > >> From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of > >> Rafael J. Wysocki > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for > table > >> loading > >> > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>> Hi, Rafael > >>> > >>> Can we queue this up in linux-next? > >>> ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions > can be > >> seen. > >>> We need more tests around this experimental change from the real > users to > >> have the chances to learn the unknown cases. > >>> If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by > reverting > >> [PATCH 4/4]. > >>> So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream. > >>> Thanks in advance. > >> There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only > >> contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next > >> should only contain material targeted at v4.7. > >> > >> For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but > >> I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released. > > [Lv Zheng] > > Great! > > Thanks for the information. > > Unfortunately, it is reported that the series actually causes problems > to happen. > > I sent you a CC of my response to the report in question earlier today. [Lv Zheng] Could the problem be stopped by reverting PATCH 4/4? Let me check with the reporter to learn the case. Thanks and best regards -Lv ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
