On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
AArch32 state")
[...]
David Daney (2):
arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
Hanjun Guo (11):
acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
drivers/acpi/numa.c
acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
drivers/acpi/numa.c
arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
Robert Richter (1):
acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].
There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been
largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take
a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.
That would be 4.7 and 4.8 respectively I suppose?
Anyway, Catalin has ACKed all of them except for the [13/14], so
technically I can apply [1-12/14] now and then [13-14/14] can be
applied when they are ready.
Do you think there will be any problems with merging [6-7/14] into 4.7
via the ACPI tree?
I would defer to the arm64 maintainers for decisions about the arm64
specific parts of the patch set. That said, many of the arm64 specific
patches depend on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so you would have to
be careful about merge ordering if you pull these in before the
for-next/core branch is merged.
Also FWIW, I plan on addressing Catalin's comments about 13/14 and
posting a new version of the patch set in the next day or two.
Thanks for looking at these,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
