On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
> > AArch32 state")
[...]
> > David Daney (2):
> > arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
> > acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
> >
> > Hanjun Guo (11):
> > acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
> > acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
> > acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
> > acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
> > arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
> > x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
> > acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
> > drivers/acpi/numa.c
> > acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
> > acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
> > drivers/acpi/numa.c
> > arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
> > acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
> >
> > Robert Richter (1):
> > acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
>
> I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].
There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been
largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take
a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
