On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 6. April 2016 17:53:49 CEST Dan Williams wrote: >> Provide simulated SMART data to enable the ndctl implementation of SMART >> data retrieval and parsing. >> >> The payload is defined here, "Section 4.1 SMART and Health Info >> (Function Index 1)": >> >> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface_Example.pdf >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > [...] > >> @@ -20,6 +20,35 @@ struct nd_cmd_smart { >> __u8 data[128]; >> } __packed; >> >> +enum { >> + ND_SMART_HEALTH_VALID = 1 << 0, >> + ND_SMART_TEMP_VALID = 1 << 1, >> + ND_SMART_SPARES_VALID = 1 << 2, >> + ND_SMART_ALARM_VALID = 1 << 3, >> + ND_SMART_USED_VALID = 1 << 4, >> + ND_SMART_SHUTDOWN_VALID = 1 << 5, >> + ND_SMART_VENDOR_VALID = 1 << 6, >> + ND_SMART_TEMP_TRIP = 1 << 0, >> + ND_SMART_SPARE_TRIP = 1 << 1, >> + ND_SMART_NON_CRITICAL_HEALTH = 1 << 0, >> + ND_SMART_CRITICAL_HEALTH = 1 << 1, >> + ND_SMART_FATAL_HEALTH = 1 << 2, >> +}; > > Why not use BIT() instead of that 1 << x stuff and #define instead of the > abstract enum? Can't use BIT() since that definition isn't exported in a user header. I don't have a strong opinion of #define vs anonymous enum, I'll go ahead and switch it over. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
