On Mittwoch, 6. April 2016 17:53:49 CEST Dan Williams wrote: > Provide simulated SMART data to enable the ndctl implementation of SMART > data retrieval and parsing. > > The payload is defined here, "Section 4.1 SMART and Health Info > (Function Index 1)": > > http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface_Example.pdf > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > --- [...] > @@ -20,6 +20,35 @@ struct nd_cmd_smart { > __u8 data[128]; > } __packed; > > +enum { > + ND_SMART_HEALTH_VALID = 1 << 0, > + ND_SMART_TEMP_VALID = 1 << 1, > + ND_SMART_SPARES_VALID = 1 << 2, > + ND_SMART_ALARM_VALID = 1 << 3, > + ND_SMART_USED_VALID = 1 << 4, > + ND_SMART_SHUTDOWN_VALID = 1 << 5, > + ND_SMART_VENDOR_VALID = 1 << 6, > + ND_SMART_TEMP_TRIP = 1 << 0, > + ND_SMART_SPARE_TRIP = 1 << 1, > + ND_SMART_NON_CRITICAL_HEALTH = 1 << 0, > + ND_SMART_CRITICAL_HEALTH = 1 << 1, > + ND_SMART_FATAL_HEALTH = 1 << 2, > +}; Why not use BIT() instead of that 1 << x stuff and #define instead of the abstract enum? -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html