On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 05:37 +0000, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, Hi again. > > No, I disagree. _I_ don't need to. You need to. > [Lv Zheng] > Then you don't have to provide the solution as you are not the one executing the process. > I can fix it myself: > https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/129 ; > It would be merged by the ACPICA upstream in the near future. Excellent, thank you. For this: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/129/commits/b2294cae776f5a66a7697414b21949d307e6856f Maybe you could use \w+ instead of [_a-zA-Z0-9]+ > I'll show you the difficulties of "process" later. ok, appreciate your time. > > You shouldn't have a process that generates defective patches > > and then sends them to the list. > [Lv Zheng] > You are not the one executing this process, so you don't know what's happening here. True. > Actually the Linux repo should be synced to the state of the ACPICA repo. That's more doubtful, but then again I don't maintain ACPICA and you do. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
