On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 09:38 +0800, Lv Zheng wrote: > The patch reduces source code differences between the Linux kernel and the > ACPICA upstream so that the linuxized ACPICA 20160212 release can be > applied with reduced human intervention. In the very first patch fragment: > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c [] > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ acpi_hw_validate_register(struct acpi_generic_address *reg, > * > ******************************************************************************/ > > -acpi_status acpi_hw_read(u32 *value, struct acpi_generic_address *reg) > +acpi_status acpi_hw_read(u32 *value, struct acpi_generic_address * reg) The second argument * style appears the opposite of normal style and a different style than the first argument * style. > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c [] > @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static char acpi_os_name[ACPI_MAX_OVERRIDE_LEN]; > > acpi_status > acpi_os_predefined_override(const struct acpi_predefined_names *init_val, > - char **new_val) > + acpi_string *new_val) And here: acpi_string pointer style 1: > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h b/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h [] > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ acpi_physical_address acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void); > #ifndef ACPI_USE_ALTERNATE_PROTOTYPE_acpi_os_predefined_override > acpi_status > acpi_os_predefined_override(const struct acpi_predefined_names *init_val, > - char **new_val); > + acpi_string * new_val); acpi_string pointer style 2: There are varying styles for acpi_string * So far, this just looks sloppy. Should the rest be reviewed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
