On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:01:45AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> + } else if (sg_policy->next_freq != next_freq) {
>> + sg_policy->work_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + irq_work_queue(&sg_policy->irq_work);
>> + }
>> +}
>
>> +static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>> +{
>> + struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
>> +
>> + sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
>> + schedule_work_on(sg_policy->work_cpu, &sg_policy->work);
>> +}
>
> Not sure I see the point of ->work_cpu, irq_work_queue() does guarantee
> the same CPU, so the above is identical to:
>
> schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &sq_policy->work);
OK
I'll do that and restore work_in_progress, then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
