On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 23:45, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Friday, March 11, 2016 12:58:15 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:57:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> > > It doesn't seem to do any runtime PM, >>> > > I do wonder if pcieport should be doing it's own runtime PM handling, >>> > > but that is a >>> > > larger task than I'm thinking to tackle here. >>> > >>> > PCIe ports don't do PM - yet. Mika has posted a series of patches to implement >>> > that, however, that are waiting for comments now: >>> > >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453311/ >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453381/ >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453391/ >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453411/ >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453371/ >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453351/ >>> > >>> > > Maybe I should be doing >>> > > >>> > > pci_set_power_state(pdev->bus->self, PCI_D3cold) ? I'm not really sure. >>> > >>> > Using pci_set_power_state() would be more appropriate IMO, but you can get >>> > to the bridge via dev->parent too, can't you? >>> > >>> > In any case, it looks like you and Mika need to talk. :-) >>> >>> When the vga_switcheroo device gets runtime suspended (with the above >>> runtime PM patchs for PCIe root ports) the root port should also be >>> runtime suspended by the PM core. >> >> Right, after your patches have been applied, the additional handling >> won't be needed. >> >> So Dave, maybe you can check if the Mika's patches help? > > Hi Mika, > > I tested your patches with a couple of changes on the Lenovo W541. > > The attached patch contains the two things I needed to get the same > functionality > as my patches. > > I'm really not in love with the per-chipset enablement for this, > really any chipsets > after a certain year should probably be better, as we'll constantly be > adding PCI Ids > for every chipset ever made, and I expect we'll forget some. Yeah, I don't care of that either. There are always going to be chipsets falling through the cracks. Alex > > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
